SearchBlog AuthorsTom Boone
Reference Librarian for Electronic Services
Lillian Goldman Law Library
Yale Law School
Joshua Brauer
Principal
Brauer Ranch
Boise, Idaho
ContactFeel free to contact us with your comments, thoughts, and ideas...
Contact Tom:
trboone@gmail.com AIM/Yahoo: tomyalelaw Contact Joshua:
joshua.brauer@gmail.com AIM: joshunlvlaw SyndicateBlogroll |
Wanted: automated email reference systemSubmitted by Tom Boone on June 27, 2007 - 3:00pm.
Helperoo launched earlier this week, offering a low cost, web-based email support system for small businesses. The service allows companies to forward support email into a system that functions as a ticketing system to keep track of open and closed support requests. This could potentially be used by a library to keep track an respond to email reference questions. In fact, I've been turning over such an idea in my head for about six months now, but with some different features that are geared more to the specific needs of a small library reference staff. Here's a taste of what I'm thinking. 1. Patron submits question 2. System processes question automatically 3. Librarian responds 4. Subsequent communication At any time in this process, a librarian can post to the blog system instead of using email. This shouldn't hinder the process at all. A comment posting will simply result in an email being sent to the patron. Elmer Masters has already accomplished the two way interaction between blog and email with the Teknoids listserv and archive using Drupal and some of its add on modules. (Drupal is also the platform for Library Laws and just about every web site I've built in the last 18 months). Elmer doesn't alter the email addresses in any way, but in his environment there's no need to. For me, the killer app here -- and one that simple systems like Helperoo don't address -- is the automatic assignment of a librarian to each question on a rotational basis. Honestly, if a reference supervisor has to go in and manually assign questions, she could just as easily forward the question to that librarian manually as well. But with that step automated, the system becomes far more efficient. This system really only seems applicable to libraries dealing with public patrons, because direct and personal interaction between faculty and librarians is typically deemed a good thing at universities, especially at institutions where a liaison system exists. Many public libraries also desire such personal relationships with patrons, meaning this system's efficiency might not be worth it unless the system does NOT strip the librarian's info from messages (an easy enough task, surely). For law libraries that deal with members of the public, however, some measure of anonymity might be desirable. More importantly, with a central system in place, it ensures that patrons will still have a central contact point with the library even if the librarian who previously helped them goes on vacation or quits. Now if I just had the time to build this thing. Bookmark/Search this post with:
( categories: )
|
Automated reference
So I fill out a form and it gets emailed to a rotation of librarians. Now, do the librarians respond through a form, or through email? A form would be better, I think, for anonyminity. The email to the librarian contains the text of the inquiry and a unique link back to a form that is filled out with a response. The form is submitted, generating an email back to the patron. The patron email also contains a unique link to a web form for further communication. Email acts as a tickler or previewer with a nice database driven web app handling the tracking and archiving of the conversations.
See what happens when you mention my name:) Anyway, it would be pretty straight forward to do, possibly even in Drupal. Of course, time is money, especially these days, so the real question is how much is this worth. Always the toughest one.
Good idea
I think you're spot on about having the librarian's use a form, too, just like the patrons.
When I was coming up with the idea, I was opposed to making the librarian's use the website because it meant yet another system they had to log in to and check regularly. Forget to check for a day or two and a reference question lingers unanswered. Whereas email is something the librarians are already using and checking all the time (hopefully).
But the middle ground you suggest would work beautifully. Librarians don't have to check the site for new questions because the system notifies them by email when there is a new question assigned to them. That email includes a link to the question and the reply form. Hit submit and the system emails the patron.