SearchBlog AuthorsTom Boone
Reference Librarian for Electronic Services
Lillian Goldman Law Library
Yale Law School
Joshua Brauer
Principal
Brauer Ranch
Boise, Idaho
ContactFeel free to contact us with your comments, thoughts, and ideas...
Contact Tom:
trboone@gmail.com AIM/Yahoo: tomyalelaw Contact Joshua:
joshua.brauer@gmail.com AIM: joshunlvlaw SyndicateBlogroll |
Technology PlanningWritely taking new usersSubmitted by Joshua Brauer on September 1, 2006 - 10:52am.
Just in time for the Labor Day holiday Writely is taking new users. Google purchased the web-based word processor earlier this year and had put new registrations on hold. I'll be testing the functionality of Writely from a hotel room this weekend and will see how it does with that level of connectivity. The only question is how soon Google Apps for Domains will include Google Spreadsheet, Writely and a solid group-oriented file storage system. Bookmark/Search this post with: ( categories: )
Google tools for everyoneSubmitted by Joshua Brauer on August 28, 2006 - 8:48am.
Google today released Google Apps for Domains. The program brings the hosted Gmail solution of the last few months out of beta and into general availability. The service bundles Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Talk and Google page creator. According to the company's website a premium service will be rolled out in the future. News reports suggest this service may include more flexibility in setting up and administering accounts as well as ad-free versions of the service. Meanwhile law schools like ours are already making the move. Bookmark/Search this post with: ( categories: )
Drafting a law library technology planSubmitted by Tom Boone on May 23, 2006 - 11:42am.
Two weeks ago I posted about a technology plan I was developing for the law library. Well, the draft is now complete, and I'll be submitting it to our director for approval later today. In composing the plan, I've tried to incorporate usability and patron needs into as many areas as I can. In addition, I've made every effort to leave as much room as possible for seamless adoption of new technologies as they emerge -- thus there is no mention of any specific tools in the plan. Here's the complete draft:
Two weeks of staring at this document have left me a bit myopic. Am I missing anything? Comments and criticism are welcomed. Bookmark/Search this post with: ( categories: )
Reflections on a week of library technology planningSubmitted by Tom Boone on May 10, 2006 - 9:29am.
Update: To see the complete draft of the technology plan, please read this post. This week I'm engaged in writing a long-term technology plan for the library. This is an extremely challenging endeavor, not least of all because it's the first time I've been charged with composing such a document. Furthermore, there's no way to predict exactly where technology will lead in the next several years, at least not in any meaningful detail. As a result, I have to make sure to use language that is specific enough to give us a distinct direction in which to move but is vague enough not to lock us in to any specific tools that may become obsolete before we can even implement them. The document's first goal involves remote access. A colleague of mine who works for a state court library is continuously frustrated by the fact that her library's website is maintained entirely by a separate department that handles PR duties for the government. This is precisely the mindset I want to avoid. Patron expectations have advanced to the point where a library website has to be much more than a PR tool for promoting the physical structure and the physical collection. The website needs to evolve into a full fledged branch location of the library. The website *is* the library. In laying the groundwork for this to happen, I've tried to ignore what is currently possible, both technologically and economically, and instead focus on what we would provide to patrons if anything was possible. Here's my current draft of Goal #1:
There is no mention of specific tools, no blogs, IM, RSS, mobile devices, etc. It is certainly my intent that those kinds of tools fall logically from the priorities listed (assuming they are the best tools available to accomplish these priorities), but those kinds of specifics can be outlined in detail in the plans for each individual technology project we undertake. And should better tools emerge in the meantime, this plan already provides for their implementation, too. That's not to say this document is intended to cover all foreseeable events. The final goal in the technology plan will outline a procedure for re-evaluating the plan on a regular basis (quarterly? semi-annually? annually? I don't know yet), and providing for the capability to revise it as necessary. Bookmark/Search this post with: ( categories: )
|